SV-221043r622190_rule
V-221043
SRG-NET-000512-RTR-000010
CISC-RT-000690
CAT III
10
Enable split horizon on all PE switches deploying VPLS in a full-mesh configuration.
SW1(config)#l2 vfi VPLS_A manual
SW1(config-vfi)#neighbor 10.3.3.3 encapsulation mpls
Review the PE switch configuration to verify that split horizon is enabled. By default, split horizon is enabled; hence, the attribute no-split-horizon should not be seen on the neighbor command as shown in the example below:
l2 vfi VPLS_A manual
vpn id 110
bridge-domain 100
neighbor 10.3.3.3 encapsulation mpls no-split-horizon
If split horizon is not enabled, this is a finding.
Note: This requirement is only applicable to a mesh VPLS topology. VPLS solves the loop problem by using a split-horizon rule which states that member PE switches of a VPLS must forward VPLS traffic only to the local attachment circuits when they receive the traffic from the other PE switches. In a ring VPLS, split horizon must be disabled so that a PE switch can forward a packet received from one pseudowire to another pseudowire. To prevent the consequential loop, at least one span in the ring would not have a pseudowire for any given VPLS instance.
V-221043
False
CISC-RT-000690
Review the PE switch configuration to verify that split horizon is enabled. By default, split horizon is enabled; hence, the attribute no-split-horizon should not be seen on the neighbor command as shown in the example below:
l2 vfi VPLS_A manual
vpn id 110
bridge-domain 100
neighbor 10.3.3.3 encapsulation mpls no-split-horizon
If split horizon is not enabled, this is a finding.
Note: This requirement is only applicable to a mesh VPLS topology. VPLS solves the loop problem by using a split-horizon rule which states that member PE switches of a VPLS must forward VPLS traffic only to the local attachment circuits when they receive the traffic from the other PE switches. In a ring VPLS, split horizon must be disabled so that a PE switch can forward a packet received from one pseudowire to another pseudowire. To prevent the consequential loop, at least one span in the ring would not have a pseudowire for any given VPLS instance.
M
4074